Feb. 23, 2013

Carolyn details the life and achievements of two under-appreciated German National Socialist Party members and how they were perversely persecuted by jealous Jews. It is a study in the Jewish art of revenge and their targeting of the weak and those who are in a vulnerable position. It is a study of cowardice going up against courage. It is a warning of what is in store for all of us if we don’t regain our sovereignty.

• Arthur Rudolf (left picture) was essential in developing the German V-2 Rocket for the first jet aircraft in the world – then developed the Saturn 5 rocket that sent American’s to the moon in 1969;
• Later the U.S Justice Dept. and Congress allowed him to be branded a war criminal and banished from the country by a cabal of Jews;
• Forgot to mention that Rep. Bill Green of NY (Jew) introduced a bill in 1985 to strip Rudolph of the NASA Distinguished Service Medal, and reintroduced it in 1987;
• Julius Streicher (right picture) helped build up the National Socialist Party and Adolf Hitler’s popularity with his controversial but truthful magazine Der Stürmer (The Stormer);
• The anti-Hitler Allied War Crimes Tribunal inaccurately and illegally charged him as a war criminal (when he had nothing to do with the war) and allowed Jewish and Negro officers to torture him in prison.

Feb. 21, 2013

Carolyn Yeager and Hadding Scott read and comment on Chapter 30:  How Jews Capitalized a Protest Against Jews.

When the Theatrical Trust was finally broken, it was done by another group of Jews led by David Belasco and the Shubert brothers (J.J. and Lee Shubert shown at right in the 1920′s).  The Shuberts turned the theatrical business into real estate speculation and made more money in theatrical leases and buildings. By the eve of the Depression (1930), the Shuberts owned, operated, managed or booked close to a thousand houses across the United States.

Chapter 31, “The Jewish Aspect of the ‘Movie’ Problem” was begun at the halfway point in tonight’s program. The attention is placed on the immorality, lasciviousness, criminality, etc. of the films and that it simply reflects the taste of the Jews who make them. But also, a movie with sex brings in twice to ten times more in revenue that a decent movie, it was said. An analysis of the motion picture industry revealed that 90% of parent companies were in the hands of Jews. Independent (non-Jewish) producers had to sell in the open market.

Next week we will complete Chapter 31 and go on to Chapter 32. 

Note: We are using the Noontide Press publication of  The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file.

Image

"A great find" is how my correspondent describes this photo from the Christ Church in Hamburg-Wandsbek. On the interior arch it says: "Our Faith is the Victory." At the beginning of the words is a cross; at the end a swastika.

This symbology certainly was not forced on churches, but was the decision of the congregation. Many did subscribe to the "Positive Christianity" or "German Christianity" that was encouraged by the National Socialists.

Here you can see a picture of  the church with it's tall bell-tower, still in existence.

And below are the bells in the tower. It was common during the Third Reich for the people to combine the two symbols.

Image

This is news because it is the FIRST TIME a Protestant church in Hamburg, Germany's second largest city, will be converted into a mosque, according to my correspondent who calls it "a breach of taboo and a break in a dam."

Kapernaumkirch (Capernaum Church), pictured at right, a cultural heritage site, is located in the Horn district in downtown Hamburg. It was abandoned in 2002 for financial reasons due to declining membership. From this article:

The building and an adjacent 44 meter (144 foot) tower/steeple as well as the surrounding land was sold in 2005 to an investor, the Al-Nour Islamic Center, which has approximately 600 members, mainly made up of Arab Muslim immigrants from the Middle East and North Africa.

The church is currently undergoing renovations at a cost of one million euros ($1.4 million) and is scheduled to be reopened as a mosque on October 3, the Day of German Unity [Tag der Deutschen Einheit], a public holiday commemorating the anniversary of German reunification in 1990. Muslims in Germany have also claimed October 3 as Open Mosque Day [Tag der offenen Moschee], a day when non-Muslims are allowed to visit mosques.

Read more in English here.

Feb. 18, 2013

Two treaties from WWI that are overshadowed by the Treaty of Versailles, which the Germans of 1920 were forced to sign, were the Treaty of Saint-Germain between the Allied Powers and Austria, and the Treaty of Trianon between the Allies and Hungary. Some highlights:

• How the World War got started – it wasn’t German militarism;
• Monarchies were overturned in favor of Democratic Republics;
• Austrians were denied the right to name their smaller “rump” country German-Austria;
• Hungary’s new borders gave them 72% less territory and 64% less population than pre-war;
• Two new countries were created: Czechoslovakia and the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes;
• The Allies (France, Britain, U.S.), in spite of their stated policy of self-determination for all people, hypocritically rejected the idea of plebiscites;
• Widespread unemployment and loss of exchange of goods in the entire region was the result of the harsh treaty provisions.

Feb. 16, 2013

After being frustrated by Herb Stolpmann‘s silence to questions she put to him in a comments section at Scrapbookpages Blog, Carolyn did a thorough reading of Stolpmann’s DachauKZ blog.  From this, she extracted the character study she presents in this program. She describes Stolpmann as a “cosmopolitan” internationalist who finds some kind of satisfaction by relating his brief WWII experience in the Wehrmacht and lengthy post-war experience at the Dachau former concentration camp in the employ of the Americans. His preference for Americans over Germans is quite clear, but it also seems that Germans did not care much for him!

After running out of stories about Dachau, Herb’s later entries are mainly text taken directly from communist, Jewish and Soviet Russian sources about other German concentration camps.

Feb. 14, 2013

Hadding Scott and Carolyn Yeager  read and comment on Chapter 29: "The Rise of the First Jewish Theatrical Trust."

Jewish immigration to the United States between 1880 -1900, particularly heavy from Russia, coincided with the Jewish intent to monopolize the communication and education industries, including the Theater.  As early as 1896, certain New York Jews had combined forces to create a  “Theatrical Trust” that controlled 37 theaters in strategic cities. At the time of a lawsuit against the Trust in 1907, it was said they controlled 500 of the 600 most prominent theaters! Outside the Trust, the managers and companies were left to make arrangements between each other, which had a disastrous effect on the artistic quality of theater.

The Trust boosted royalties on plays from $50 to $450 and eventually to $1,000 a week. This of itself cut off the material of the stock companies with which the independent managers endeavored to keep open their houses. The artists organized serious opposition to the Trust, but the Trust lawyers sought out their weaknesses, and one by one, they deserted. Finally, only Mrs. Fiske (shown above right in 1896) was left to carry on the fight with her husband, Harrison Grey Fiske, editor of the New York  Dramatic Mirror. Mrs. Fiske said of the Jews of the Trust, “The incompetent men who have seized upon the affairs of the stage in this country have all but killed art, ambition and decency.”

Note: We are using the Noontide Press publication of  The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file.

by Carolyn Yeager

The interview with psychiatrist Max Hamburger that appeared in the March 2012 Dutch magazine Aanspraak was translated into English for me by Hasso Castrup. Some things that Hamburger said are revealing of his overall honesty when it comes to his statements about “the Holocaust.” Being a “holocaust survivor” who appears in the famous photograph is, after all, his only claim to fame.

From the article:

He says that “shortly afterwards we were betrayed and arrested, interrogated and deported to Westerbork. My mother was also betrayed.” On Sunday, February 6, 1944, he saw her for the last time in the penal barracks at Westerbork. They fell into each other’s arms and cried. But then … “In Auschwitz I met a fellow radiologist who was deported together with her. He told me that my mother was gassed on March 6, 1944. I arrived there on February 10, 1944 (his 24th birthday, but he doesn’t mention it), but did not see her again.” 

Since we know there were no gassings at Auschwitz, this is a dead giveaway that he’s telling a big lie, although he’s putting the lie in the mouth of an unnamed “fellow radiologist.” This is a trick that is used often by so-called witnesses and “survivors.” The so-called informant should always be named; if they can’t name the informer, they should not be believed. 

*   *    *

The train took them to Gross Rosen, where an old factory was assigned as their hospital. He says “we” had to vaccinate everyone against typhus in February 1945. Their only hope were reports of advancing Russians and Americans, which they knew of because a fellow prisoner secretly listened to the radio. At the evacuation of the camp they had to walk in the snow to the Czech Republic. From there they were taken by train from Prague to Flossenbürg camp in Bavaria. 

According to USHMM, Gross Rosen camp was evacuated in early February ’45 and “about 40,000” from the main camp and sub-camps had to march west. This is a lot of inoculation to be done in a few days. But more important, the 9-month period he spent at Gross Rosen between May 1944 and February 1945 is blank. May 1944 coincides with the time of the large Hungarian deportation to Auschwitz; Hamburger says he was with a Hungarian labor unit that had already been to Auschwitz and sent out from there. Would not the new arrivals also have been sent out from there in like manner? From here on, his narrative remains very sketchy, and is mostly made up of vague horror stories.

Please go to Elie Wiesel Cons The World for full article

DETROIT (CBS Detroit) Is it art meant to highlight a decaying industrial complex in a dying city or a chilling threat?

The phrase “Arbeit Macht Frei,” which famously greeted Nazi prisoners at the Auschwitz concentration camp during World War II, has a new home.

It sits prominently on a bridge overlooking the Packard Plant in Detroit. The words are in the same script as the labor camp, but in this case they lord over the hulking plant that once created luxury cars and now serves as a decrepit 40-acre squatting grounds for the homeless, and a favorite spot for scrappers, graffiti artists and ruin porn photography.

The factory that built luxury Packard cars at the start of the 20th Century, closed in 1958. The city of Detroit has pledged to take the plant down, but that hasn’t happened yet.

The German words now prominently displayed on it translate into English as “work will make you free,” and they guarded the gates at the (Auschwitz) camp.

“Each letter is fashioned on a durable piece of plastic that is strongly secured to the overpass with about 80 sturdy ties,” according to DeadlineDetroit.com.

Steve Goldman of the Holocaust Memorial Center (naturally they ask him ) finds it offensive and thinks it should be removed, even if it is an artistic statement on labor issues, as some believe.

“In a month, when we’re celebrating the freedom of African-Americans — of all Americans from the scourge of slavery — this hearkening back to slave labor in Nazi Germany … it’s just so offensive I almost don’t have words,” Goldman said. Oy vey.

So, what do you think: Should the city take it down?
Thank you for voting!
No, it's a piece of art  51.16%  
Yes, it's threatening  48.84%

Threatening, you say? What is it threatening? The words mean "Work Makes You Free." To Germans, work was a necessity for a feeling of accomplishment, it was not thought to be a bad punishment. The meaning of the words on the gate at Auschwitz was that, by working, the people brought there would gain a greater sense of collective purpose, and could then be returned to society as more productive and constructive citizens.

Nothing threatening at all.

Nationalist marchers hemmed in by police in Dresden Germany, Feb. 12, 2013.

By Carolyn Yeager

Up to 2,000 nationalists and patriots from around Germany (far fewer than in previous years) gathered in Dresden today for their traditional silent torchlight march in memory of their murdered countrymen in the Feb. 1945 firebombing of the city by British and American air forces.

But the city was ready for them, ready, that is, to deny them the right to do what others of a different political persuasion are allowed to do. Nearly 6,000 police officers had been sent to Dresden, ostensibly to protect their march, but in reality to enforce the wishes of the Dresden city officials who this year decided to upstage the nationalist march with a demonstration of their own.

More than 10,000 people (according to the news) formed a human chain to prevent the nationalists from marching.

City wants emphasis on reconciliation

Ten thousand candles were provided by the city to the counter-demonstrators to be lit in front of the landmark Frauenkirche. This beloved old church was destroyed in the bombing and only rebuilt in recent years. The candles were arranged in front of the church to form a "candle of reconciliation."

Yet in London last year, Queen Elizabeth herself "cut the ribbon" on a large monument recognizing the "brave" British pilots who carried out the bombing on Dresden! No talk of reconciliation there.

Police cordoned off the nationalists - who are always called Neo-Nazis and extremists by everyone, even the Press - while the counter-demonstrators banged drums and shouted "Out with Nazis!" Is it any wonder that fewer marchers showed up this year when it is such a completely depressing experience?   

Commercial interests outweigh the truth of history

At a memorial service earlier in the day, Jewish leaders and church representatives mostly spoke against far-right extremism. Disgustingly, representatives from the UK and US were also in attendance, but not in penitence - no doubt quite self-righteously. There has never been even a hint of an apology from those nations - Germans are still doing all the apologizing. In fact, the city of Dresden calls it's event a commemoration for past war-time bombing victims in Dresden, England's Coventry and Japan's Hiroshima! God forbid that German suffering should stand out.

It does seem that the only thing post-unification Dresden wants to say to the world is "We don't want far-right extremism." Sure, and we know why - it hurts tourism, which is Dresden's number one industry.

It's painful to recognize that this is their only response to the devastating, sadistic two-day roasting of German women and children, both city residents and refugees, in 1945. The death toll is officially declared always to be 'up to 25,000' when, at the time following the bombing, it was widely known and stated to be over 100,000.  It sickens me too much to say anymore about it except Armes Deutschland.