The Shrinking 'Holocaust'

... How small can it get and still be called a Holocaust?

By Carolyn Yeager

ANOTHER 'DEATH CAMP' HAS BEEN QUIETLY REMOVED from the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM) website's pages on the "Final Solution."

A recent email from Jon M. brought to my attention that the flagship U.S. Holocaust museum in Washington DC has made a significant change to their description of “the final solution.”

Compare the "Final Solution" page on the site today with the "Final Solution" page on April 21, 2021, using the Wayback Machine. It at that time read:

"After the Wannsee Conference in January 1942, the Nazis began the systematic deportation of Jews from all over Europe to six extermination camps established in former Polish territory—Chelmno, Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka, Auschwitz-Birkenau, and Majdanek.”

So while only five camps are included now, previous to April 2021 there were six. The current version of the "Final Solution" page has the sentence, but you kind of have to hunt for it :

"There were five killing centers: Chełmno, Bełżec, Sobibór, Treblinka, and Auschwitz-Birkenau."

Though they're now using the term “killing centers" in place of “extermination camps,” it refers to the same thing. It's another sign of how they're always fiddling with the language, as well as with their storyline . Will the word  “extermination” now go out of favor?

It was always a stretch to make the detention camp at Majdanek into an “extermination” camp or a "killing center," and the shower building there, with it's windows and other non-secure features, into a homicidal gas chamber. But they don't explain, or give any reasons, do they? No, they just say on this page : 

... recent research has shed more light on the functions and operations at Lublin-Majdanek. [...] It [only] occasionally functioned as a killing site for victims who could not be killed at the Operation Reinhard camps. 

No evidence presented that it ever functioned in that way, either. USHMM is blatantly saying so without a single example or detail to back it up. They expect to be taken at their word, and unfortunately they are. 

This latest “revision” is not completed on all pages of the website. They start with changing a main page or two, and eventually get to all the other places where that 'old' information is referred to, as they come upon it. For example, on the page titled KILLING CENTERS: An Overview, they name only the five camps in the text (Chelmno, Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka and Auschwitz-Birkenau) but use a map that includes Majdanek and map-description that reads: “the Nazis established six killing centers in former Polish territory—Chelmno, Belzec, Sobibor, Trelinka, Auschwitz-Birkenau, and Majdanek. 

On another encyclopedia page: they still have Majdanek included, on the map and in the text. It clearly takes them awhile to locate every page that contains information they want to change, with maps no doubt being the last to be attended to.

Liar, liar, pants on fire

But what does this tell us? That the entire “Holocaust” was a compilation of wartime propaganda and atrocity tales, much of it made up on the fly, that was force-fed to the public by an already complicit and involved media. The hoaxers didn't have to concern themselves  with any pushback from the totally defeated and leaderless former Axis powers. Both Japan and Germany had been bombed without mercy and forced into Unconditional Surrender. Germany especially was stripped of everything. Italy had already changed allegiance in 1944. The Eastern European nations and eastern section of Germany were overrun and put behind an “Iron Curtain” by the  Soviet Union. This resulted in the former detention centers in the German 'General-Government' -- the former Poland and then Soviet Poland --  becoming off-limits to Western investigators and visitors for 45 years! During this time, the myth of the “Death Camps” was propagated and had free rein. It burrowed deep into the world consciousness. 

Now that Revisionism is still engaged in undoing all the damage that was done to Truth, it seems only good and proper that the Holocaust Industry, such as the USHMM, sometimes unintentionally aids us in this gigantic undertaking. We can expect other major establishment sources of information (such as Wikipedia) to follow along eventually, since the USHMM is considered to be (wrongly, of course) an authoritative voice. In truth, the USHMM has always just made things up -- which is why they have to keep adjusting their narrative.