To give a free pass to Jewish supremacy everywhere in the world!
By Carolyn Yeager
ON MONDAY, JANUARY 27, THE MEDIA WILL ONCE AGAIN play up the United Nations-created “International Day of Commemoration in Memory of the Victims of the Holocaust”, commonly known as Holocaust Remembrance Day. This will be only the 15th anniversary of this commemoration, but the 75th anniversary of what it specifically commemorates – the day the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp was "liberated" by the Soviet Red Army.
I heartily encourage you to go to jan27.org beginning on Thursday the 23rd to see the new articles presented there "in Honor of the Revisionists Who Introduced Sanity to the Auschwitz 'Death Camp' Narrative.” Support Revisionism! There are innumerable reasons why it is in your own interests to do so. For example:
Three years ago, in May 2017, I put up a very important post, as it turned out, warning about the IHRA – the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance – and explained why it was dangerous. It would be well to re-read the whole post at this time [and also here and here]. What follows is the part about the IHRA that appeared at the end:
IHRA working definition of antisemitism being pushed
Then there's the latest new definition of antisemitism that is being pushed on everyone.-- this one put out by an organization called the 'International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance.' This is a globalist group that started up in Sweden (ostensibly) in 1998, for the purpose of “expanding Holocaust education worldwide.” This is their non-legally binding working definition of antisemitism:
“Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”
Does this clarify anything? No, it does not. What is it's purpose? I don't know but it is currently being pushed in the UK with the help of the Board of Deputies of British Jews. It goes on to explain:
Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.
Further specific definitions include:
Antisemitic discrimination is the denial to Jews of opportunities or services available to others and is illegal in many countries.
Just this month, the Slovenian delegation to the IHRA issued a public statement condemning an incident of Holocaust denial -- in late April Bernard Brščič "denied the Holocaust" in a TV interview. Oh, horrors. The delegations are generally made up of Jews and this is the kind of reporting they do.
When organizations resist
Most recently, the University and College Union (UCU) decided at its annual congress to spurn the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) definition of antisemitism as “retrograde,” “deeply disappointing” and “disgraceful.”
The UCU motion stated that the “[IHRA] definition conflates anti-semitism with criticism of the state of Israel and has been used to intimidate academics who are engaged in activities that are critical of the policies of the Israeli government but that are not anti-semitic.”
Another criticism was that the definition encourages the banning of speakers who are opposed to the policies of the state of Israel but who have not in any way expressed racism against Jewish people.”
In 2011, the UCU also rejected the definition of antisemitism proposed by the European Union Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia, which, like the IHRA, considers forms of anti-Zionism to be antisemitic.
So the Jews keep trying to get everyone to sign on to a universal agreement on antisemitism that can be used as the basis for uniform laws under which offenders can be prosecuted. It's all about their enforcement powers. And the fact is, they keep gaining ground, little by little, in spite of the clearly anti-democratic nature of what they're doing. The way to stop them is to bring down the hoax of the holocaust because it, and it alone, is the basis for all their claims against European society. (May, 2017)
Delegates at the IHRA Ministerial Meeting 2020 in Brussels.
“The fact is, they keep gaining ground, little by little.” !! That's one of the secrets to Jewish success. Beginning in 1998 with only a few states signing on, twenty-two years later the IHRC boasts 34 countries whose governments, without a vote of their people, have adopted the IHRC definition of antisemitism and committed them to enforcing laws against it. Above is a photo of the current representatives, over 40 faces—all white faces. Do you see any brown or black faces there? No, the IHRC only goes after Europeans because they use guilt over 'Nazi' concentration camps to pull us into their scheme.
This news release is disseminated by the AIJAC (Australia Israel & Jewish Affairs Council) which, like all Jewish organizations, pushes the IHRC in every way it can. It boasts that the 34 national representatives pledged “to the victims and survivors that they shall never be forgotten and that their legacy will be kept alive”.
Representatives also promised to promote Holocaust education, safeguard the historical record of the Holocaust and continue efforts to hold significant Holocaust commemorations.
The conference acknowledged “the ongoing battle against global antisemitism [is] from the left and the right." The delegates signed on to an "acceptance of responsibility as governments to continue working together to counter Holocaust denial and distortion, antisemitism, and all forms of racism and discrimination that undermine fundamental democratic principles”. In true trickster fashion, holocaust denial, and what they call distortion, is conflated with racism and anti-democracy.
It removes the right of scholars and other researchers to openly study the basis on which the Holocaust was formed! To even question their enforced version of historical events is viewed as anti-democratic, and pure 'hate'. However, it is the IHRA that demonstrates tyrannical authoritarism and anti-democracy in plain sight. Everyone can see that, if they are given the chance to see it. Giving you that chance is the purpose of the work at Jan27.org.
- 1264 views
I found this interesting...
P-K
I found this interesting...
> [IHRA] definition conflates anti-semitism with criticism of the state of Israel and has been used to intimidate academics who are engaged in activities that are critical of the policies of the Israeli government but that are not anti-semitic.
Leading into...
> The conference acknowledged “the ongoing battle against global antisemitism [is] from the left and the right."
In other words, it is the duty of the left and the right wings of Politics to support Israel or be called anti-Semitic, with then dubious, tenuous links implied to the popular understanding of "Nazism" and the so-called Holocaust. (Curiously enough, both sides of the Israel-Palestine debate openly call each other "Nazis" - the slur is surely beginning to wear thin.) So I think Jews will attempt to keep this alive as long as they can. I'm not sure they have that much more time left, as the new generations barely know a thing about it (the Holocaust) and care even less.
Additionally, why would the ever-burgeoning non-White populations care specifically about Jewish suffering? They are more concerned about their own perceived mistreatment and pursuing their own interests in this crazy new world.
> The way to stop them is to bring down the hoax of the holocaust because it, and it alone, is the basis for all their claims against European society.
One thing I do question, is if this is solely an example of Jewish supremacy in action? IMHO - There is a very definite non-Jewish interest in keeping the German war-guilt well and truly alive, primarily to contain the German people in a "soft" manner (the "hard" way is too bloody and costly.) And so Germany continues to be plundered. AH must be turning in his grave.
Not to diminish their apparent power, but I'm more inclined to believe that the Jews been given a free hand to piggy-back their cause onto what the allied victors want, rather than believe they have all the power themselves. If the wealthy, powerful, non-Jewish "elite" classes in the Western, English-speaking world did not give credence to anti-German propaganda, the theatre surely ends. So why don't they? Therein lies the rub - they like things just the way they are. Go ask Professor Kevin MacDonald.
I can't be sure what you're
carolyn
I can't be sure what you're implying with the last line: "Go ask Professor KM." So I will just state my experience with him, which goes back to 2007. I want to preface with affirming that I respect him and follow his website Occidental Observer.
However, he hates "Nazis" and Fascists more than he hates Jews. He's said that he cringes when he sees any WN displaying a swastika or other nazi-type symbol. He has nothing good to say about AH's decisions after about 1937. He can't deal with the war except on the Allies' side. Jews, on the other hand, can be alright in some instances. He has Jewish friends and associates. I'm sure you know that he won't touch the 'Holocaust.'
What do you think KM's response would be to your questioning that "There is a very definite non-Jewish interest in keeping the German war-guilt well and truly alive ..." which, by the way, is very well established and agreed to, including by me. There is no doubt about that, but it doesn't take the Jews off the hook ... or put the two groups equally in charge either. The Jews are more in charge and they have it their way. So I don't think it's in White hands to the extent you say. Just my 2-cents.
P.S. That doesn't mean I don't think that supporting Holocaust Revisionist facts (not just lampooning the 'industry') by more people like KM, or just more people, would not make a big difference. I think it would! I think that is what we need.
Well you've touched upon what
P-K
Well you've touched upon what I mean here:
> He can't deal with the war except on the Allies' side. Jews, on the other hand, can be alright in some instances. He has Jewish friends and associates. I'm sure you know that he won't touch the 'Holocaust.'
I don't know the man personally, obviously. But I've certainly read a lot of his work, including his books. I used to follow his website closely for many years, but only occasionally commented. Had a few comments removed too.
But the above paragraph is definitely what I'm getting at. Even when the Anglo-Americans wake up one morning and realise their nation has been co-opted, they refuse to do what I would call a thorough root-cause analysis. Why?
They'll never admit to being wrong. Maybe they can't! Too much blood shed, too much propaganda to overcome. They believe it's, at best, a tangential issue and even if they do explore it, they rarely come out on Germany's side. Why!?
He's on record stating that he would like to build a future with Jews. Is this a case of stockholm syndrome or what? I think this means he reckons they're more than just a little bit alright, he seriously believes he can pull them back into the "White" fold.
Now factor in that he's just the exception in his social circle, not the rule. Most "Whites" like him have no issue at all with the modern multi-kulti world, let alone Jewish power.
Re: German war guilt
> What do you think KM's response would be to your questioning...
As you say, he won't touch the Holocaust, and he has no interest in seeing WW2 through anything other than the Anglo-American-Judaic lense. His book "Culture of Critique" makes that abundantly clear as well.
However, he has relucantly admitted that had Germany won the war, then yes, in all likelyhood Europe would still have been a "White" stronghold.
Yet, the USA and other colonies just had their societies crumble (demographically speaking) all on their own without a shot fired.
That's some pretty strong cognitive dissonance isn't it?
I don't read his site anymore, because I feel I've essentially learned what I can from him.
> ... but it doesn't take the Jews off the hook ... or put the two groups equally in charge either. The Jews are more in charge and they have it their way.
I must have read thousands of articles over the years, dealing with our current demographic decline, but also the illegal wars and so on. Yes, Jews feature heavily, but they are not the only ones involved with this by a long shot. How do I tell who really runs the show? How do we know?
I think a strong case can be made that the tail, indeed, does not wag the dog.
If there is a common denominator in all of this, it's that when the Jews get up to something particularly nefarious, there is a strong contingent of non-Jews that support him (or her.) This is particularly true on migration issues, for example the Hart–Celler Act. Something similar happened here in Australia too, when the White-Australia policy was axed in the 70s.
I have seen news clippings from business and political leaders at the time openly supporting such moves. They would say things like "there are good and bad people from all over the world" - which is true, but it obviously does not justify tearing down a nation and remaking it without the public's approval first, does it?
In more recent times, I have see business leaders calling for more "skilled" migration (i.e. flood the job market with non-whites.) I don't think the Jews have a gun to these people's heads.
If anything, I've noticed that there is a wealthy class of Whites, that quite enjoys the fruits of the "reverse colonisation" process. They disappear each night into their "good neighbourhood" and could care less about anyone else.
I just feel that while it's true that the Jews feature so heavily on the soap box, it does not mean they control everything. Every now and then, they need to put the boot into someone who is not inline with their "values" (seen what happened to Renaud Camus recently?), but that doesn't mean they are going it alone.
In WW2 the Jews in Hollywood made anti-German propaganda for the USA. It aligned with their interests, yes, but they were asked to do it.
Who is really pulling the reigns here?
> That doesn't mean I don't think that supporting Holocaust Revisionist facts (not just lampooning the 'industry') by more people like KM, or just more people, would not make a big difference. I think it would! I think that is what we need.
I'm certainly a strong advocate for your approach, to wake up individuals - but I don't see a great awakening on a wide-spread scale any time soon. For every individual who questions the official narrative, there must be 10's or 100's of thousands churned out by the system that think otherwise - maybe even necessarily so. Speaking about "White" people of course.
I've repeated this assertion a few times, but I'll say it again. Germany is contractually oblidged to honour the Allied account of history, since the early 1990s. As I wrote earlier, Germany did attempt to bring up past grievences (for example, concerning territories currently occupied by Poland) at the time, and it was essentially squashed. Interesting from a couple of perspectives, no?
If this is the case, and I believe it's true, we are up against an entire system designed to supress a people. It is openly fleeced and has been for over 70 years. How can you overcome this?
But more importantly, this brings up the fact that it's not just Jews that keep Germany in this position. Maybe they can't even change, even if they wanted to. To do so, undermines so much of what has occurred since the end of WW2, including the State's so-called "moral authority" - and what to do with the not-so-small issue of all the people who live in these lands who are of German descent? Last I read, something like 17% of Americans claim some German heritgage. Australia has 900,000 who claim likewise. So the blame for WW2 gets laid at the feet of "Nazis" (not all Germans) and the Jews take advantage of this.
I believe that something will change in the future - but it will happen at the geo-political level. The world is at the brink in many ways - wars threatening, economic upheaval. In the midst of this chaos, there is perhaps an opportunity for a different view... As you say, just my 2 cents!
Before I forget - one final
P-K
Before I forget - one final comment about Kevin, on this part:
> He's said that he cringes when he sees any WN displaying a swastika or other nazi-type symbol.
This isn't surprising is it?
Like many in his class, he would like to "forget" or conveniently bury the Anglo-American involvement in getting the war going.
So to link these symbols to his pet project of "White interests" must be quite a shock to him.
Do keep in mind, he also believes that the demographic decline of Whites in the states is basically irreversable. What is this all about then?
I'm glad you still respect him. I respect his intellect and the research he's done, but I can't respect him as a man. Sorry.
> He has nothing good to say about AH's decisions after about 1937.
You actually have to wonder how thoroughly he's actually even researched it. Perhaps, we could say, it's not in his ethnic interest to do so?
(P.S. I struggle quite often with formatting in this editor- is there a tip for spacing paragraphs consistently you can share with me?)
PROsemitism
dan chapman
PROsemitism ------- what is it?
If there is an "antisemitism" you must ask: "What is PROsemitism?"
PROsemitism must be a supporter of "semitism", which really means Judaism (though most Moslems are SEMITIC and most JEWS are NOT). So what are you supporting if you are a PROsemite?
Well first of all we must define Judaism:
Judaism is neither a race or a religion, it is Xenophobic Tribalism.
XENOPHOBIC: n.
A person unduly fearful or contemptuous of that which is foreign, especially of strangers or foreign peoples.
TRIBALISM: n.
1. The organization, culture, or beliefs of a tribe.
2. A strong feeling of identity with and loyalty to one's tribe or group.
So right off the get-go you hate all NON-Jews, NON-members of YOUR group (TRIBE).
You "bundle together" for support and safety, the very definition of Fascism
THAT means, that if I am not one of the TRIBE, you do not like me.
Jews have been practicing eugenics for 3,500 years. Jewish mother "makes" you a Jew. Jewish father decides your tribe. ( A get-less woman cannot remarry within the faith, and any children she might have will not be considered Jewish.)
Since Jews BRAND all NON-Jews "gentile" automatically denigrating them, to be PROsemitic one must by definition be ANTI-GENTILE.
They hate all NON-Jews so fundamentally, that they have to SPECIFICALLY name "RIGHTEOUS GENTILES".
Those are NON-Jewish HUMANS that went so far out of their way to help/save Jews that the Jews were FORCED to ACKNOWLEDGE the humanity of that specific 'gentile". You see, PROsemites do not acknowledge the EQUALITY of spirituality and humanity of "gentiles"
What the Jewish Rabbis think of JESUS “As for Christianity, there is a dispute among Halachic authorities, but the vast majority consider it idolatry as well. Islam, on the other hand, is not considered idolatry.” Read that last bit again VERY SLOWLY so the "christianzionists" can follow: "ISLAM, on the other hand, is NOT considered idolatry.” ...........
According to the SPLC & ADL an organization is a "HATE GROUP" if it has "beliefs or practices that attack or malign an entire class of people".
Jews have HATED Egypt for 3,500 years.
Jews have HATED Babylon for 2,500 years.
Jews have HATED CHRIST and his followers for 2,000 years.
For 3,500 years antiGENTILISM has been the glue binding Judaism
Israel's entire being is predicated on the hatred of non-jews holding "The Tribe" together.
David Ben-Gurion, one of the father founders of Israel, described Zionist aims in 1948: "A Christian state should be established [in Lebanon], with its southern border on the Litani river. We will make an alliance with it. When we smash the Arab Legion's strength and bomb Amman, we will eliminate Transjordan too, and then Syria will fall. If Egypt still dares to fight on, we shall bomb Port Said, Alexandria and Cairo... And in this fashion, we will end the war and settle our forefathers' account with Egypt, Assyria, and Aram ".............. read that again
"and settle our forefathers' account with Egypt, Assyria, and Aram"
They are STILL HATING and planning deadly attacks after 3,500+ YEARS .
How do you think they feel about JESUS CHRIST whom they have HATED for 2,000 years.
Israel's MOTTOES:
(1) NEVER forgive & NEVER forget.
(2) By Way of Deception you will Do War.
Their ONLY(monotheistic) "god" is a WAR god
PROsemitism is antiGENTILEism and Gentiles are ALL NON-jews.