August 17, 2013
French Revisionist Vincent Reynouard talks about his newest video Etre national-socialiste et catholique, une contradiction? (English: “Is it a contradiction to be both National-Socialist and Catholic?”) Some highlights:
- The “Common Good” is the aim of National Socialism and the words used by Adolf Hitler in Mein Kampf;
- The “Public Interest,” used in the French Republic (and others) is not the same thing as it encourages the freedom of individuals, each with his own separate interest as long as he doesn't harm others;
- Evolutionary theory alone offers no purpose for our being here – and when our central sun goes, we will leave no trace;
- Reynouard says Hitler discovered on his own the idea of the Common Good and wrote that man is the image of “the Lord” (Seigneur);
- Another video coming (Part 2) will argue that a National-Socialist doctrine (ideology) is not yet complete, but is still to be made;
- Churchill and his faction admitted privately they did not want peace with Germany but could not say it publicly, even prior to and on Sept. 1st and 2nd 1939;
- Hitler was right to put Jews out of power but not to want to deport every last Jew from the Reich, thinks Reynouard;
- Nothing can improve until White, European people decide to change things – no use blaming the Jews;
- The White race is the best race in the sense that it’s in the natural order that Whites should rule.
Paypal has censored Vincent’s accounts. Send cash donations in your own currency to help Vincent. Go to phdnm.org for current instructions. Include your email address to get a confirmation that it was received.
- 790 views
Comments (1)
Original comments on this program
carolyn
8 Responses
JBW
August 17, 2013 at 9:46 pm
“Reynouard says Hitler discovered on his own the idea of the Common Good and wrote that man is the image of “the Lord” (Seigneur);”
THIS IS AN EXTREMELY INTERESTING TAKE ON WHAT SEEMS A ENDLESS ANALYSIS THAT GOES TO THE MOTIVATING MINDSET OF THE “HITLER YEARS” AS THE IDEA OF “MAN AS THE IMAGE OF “THE LORD”" AND ALL THAT THIS CAN IMPLY TO THE RELIGIOUSLY OBSERVANT IN THE WORLD, IS QUITE A POWERFUL IMAGE. BUT DID A.H. ACTUALLY DEAL IN THIS TYPE OF METAPHOR IN HIS SPEECHES? I AM NOT A COMPETENT ENOUGH GERMAN SPEAKER TO HAVE A CLUE, BUT HIS CATHOLIC UPBRINGING THAT IS NOT THAT WELL COVERED IN POPULAR LITERATURE MAKES IT AN INTERESTING ANALYSIS. BUT IS IT THE TRUTH?
On a lighter, more personal note, I wish I knew who and what that lovely break music that Carolyn has in the middle of the program is and is done by. Can someone give that credit?
Good show, site is very, very well done… but the heavy Gallic accent today was a bit difficult for me…,but maybe just my speaker on this end… thanks much.
Carolyn
August 17, 2013 at 10:45 pm
He wrote this in Mein Kampf, and maybe spoke it in a speech, but I can’t say where or on what page in MK. He said many things of this type, especially in his early years.
The break music is “Call of the Blood” by Dresden (but it’s time for me to change it). You can find this type of info on the program pages, for example http://thewhitenetwork-archive.com/saturday-afternoon-with-carolyn-yeager.
Thanks for the appreciative words. Vincent Reynouard has a strong French accent, but I think hearing what he has to say is worth the effort. P.S. please don’t write in all caps again.
Markus
August 18, 2013 at 12:50 am
It is very nice to hear from a French comrade.
-Dwolla.com is another paypal-like platform Vincent might try out.
-The Protocols speaks of pushing Darwinism. There is absolutely no proof of macro-evolution (evolution from one kind to another). Only micro-evolution is scientific (variation within the kind). The Darwinists show 1,000′s of examples for micro-evolution and assume that this is evidence for macro-evolution if you add millions of years, which they assume as well to support their theory. Who knows how old the earth is? Before the Darwinists came about, it was assumed to be a few 1,000 years. The Darwinists always screw the numbers so they fit their theory and dismiss numbers that do not.
Carolyn
August 18, 2013 at 1:08 am
JBW – I found this in my notes for a program I did on Christianity in National Socialism a couple of years ago.
In April 1922, the leader of the young political party named the NSDAP, Adolf Hitler, gave a speech.
“My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God’s truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter.”
“In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was his fight against the Jewish poison. Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed his blood upon the Cross.”
“As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice. …And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly, it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.”
“And when I look on my people I see them work and work and toil and labor, and at the end of the week they have only for their wages wretchedness and misery. When I go out in the morning and see these men standing in their queues and look into their pinched faces, then I believe I would be no Christian, but a very devil, if I felt no pity for them, if I did not, as did our Lord two thousand years ago, turn against those by whom today this poor people are plundered and exposed.”
Four times in that short part Hitler referred to himself “as a Christian.” Then said, “I would be no Christian if I did not do as did our Lord …”
Markus
August 18, 2013 at 1:59 am
And I would like to ask Vincent about Pétain and the French state (Vichy).
Is it correct that Pétain was the lawful leader of France under German occupation and that de Gaulle, his exile government and all following French regimes are illegal, as they violate the Hague Convention for dismissing the French-German armistice and other treaties with Germany under Hitler?
France is now not directly occupied as Germany still is, yet it is a puppet state.
Goldstein
August 18, 2013 at 11:39 am
Catholic means universal. Has any pope ever said anything about the preservation of White european mankind??? Just asking.
alsten
August 20, 2013 at 3:42 am
“Catholic means universal. Has any pope ever said anything about the preservation of White european mankind??? Just asking.”
Catholic means Universal ‘Truth’ Einstein. As for preservation… Well seeing that Vatican City is still 99% European, it’s 2000 year history is European, it’s greatest Churches are European, it’s called ‘Roman’ and everything else that’s easily established – I’m guessing they are more interested in preserving European Culture than some ‘American’ who went to war against the Continent TWICE and voted a Black guy as President.
Konrad Rhodes
August 27, 2013 at 8:57 pm
Dear Carolyn,
Sorry for my comments being so late!
Really glad you interviewed Seigneur Vincent Reynouard on this subject. I have argued this with others many times that many of those Catholics in Society of St.Pius X Catholics, Sedevacantists like those in the Society of St.Gertrude, and those who attend the Traditionalist Tridentine Rite parish churches which are in communion with the Vatican like Institute of Christ the King and Society of St.Peter, those these last two to a much lesser extent, have many members whose political and social views are basically National Socialist or perhaps Nationalist and Distributist would be a better description. A few that I knew in college were basically Catholic Monarchists who had mild racial views but were definitely of the older Catholic style anti-Judaism and anti-Jew in the sense of keeping them out of society, sic iudeos non, as E. Michael Jones has pointed out. However some more extreme Traditionalists such as Bishop Richard Williamson who famously ‘denied’ the hollow-caust on Swedish TV from Germany have definitely genetic based racialist views though he has been quite reticent in expressing these. I think I have mentioned in comments before that at one time one of his older letters could be found online in which he states his view that Whites, as Monsieur Reynouard stated, are endowed by God to be superior to non-Whites and must maintain their genetics and obey their duty to be superior and rule this planet and its non-whites. He also sees the Protocols and the Jewish conspiracy as part of a demonic deception and Jews being agents of the Devil and Antichrist which is remarkably close to what Christian Identity believes.
But from all I have read this was a much more prevalent and accepted form of Catholic Social ideology prior to the 1960′s and just as many Catholic nations and movements and people allied with the Third Reich, Leon Degrelle being the most illustrious example, I really am glad this issue was raised because they still can be National Socialists today, though they are much fewer in number, the real Catholics I mean! In fact when I visited the SSPX community in St.Mary’s, KS I would say they are ideal people to have as National Socialists though the sympathy with non-Whites who embrace their religion is always a contentious issue particularly as it concerns the ‘latin american’ countries.