Second AfD politician suffers automobile arson attack

More news from AfD's web page ...

ON MARCH 10, AN ARSON ATTACK WAS DISCOVERED on the car of the AfD provisional Berlin party chairman Nicolaus Fest. The State Criminal Police Office has taken over the investigation. On the same night, a restaurant used temporarily by the AfD for events was also attacked.

Recently, the car of the AfD Federal President Tino Chrupalla was subjected to an arson attack in Saxony. Nicolaus Fest said that neither he nor the party would "back away because of radical leftist violence." He accused the other parties of "inconspicuous smear campaigns against the AfD". While the controlled media in Germany runs stories about the threat of "far-right" violence, the constant violence coming from the Left is ignored.

*     *     *

Established parties are jointly responsible for violence against AfD politicians

On March 10 in Berlin, Beatrix von Storch, deputy federal spokeswoman for the AfD, complained that with a "defamation campaign against the AfD" the established parties had created a climate in which "extremists feel legitimized to use violence against members and politicians of the AfD".

 "With their defamation campaign against the AfD, the established parties have created a climate that legitimises extremists to use violence against members and politicians of the AfD. The completely uninhibited verbal attacks against the AfD are - as we are witnessing more and more often - the preliminary stage to politically motivated violence against those who think differently. These attacks are carried out by thugs, arsonists and other criminals and "people with attitude" - by the auxiliary troops of the established parties in the streets, in order to break down the AfD with brutal violence.

For the AfD, Parliamentary leader Tino Chrupalla called for verbal disarmament. The opposite side, however, pours oil on the fire in order to exclude the political opponent as an enemy from the democratic discourse. I call on the representatives of the established parties to condemn these attacks clearly and unequivocally and to return to fairness in political competition.”

*     *     *

Those who allow themselves to be blackmailed by children's pictures are playing Erdogan's cards

March 9, Berlin: Honorary Chairman Alexander Gauland rejected the demand of German politicians who have spoken out in favour of giving priority to the reception of women and minors at the Turkish-Greek border and their admission to Germany. This demand, which at first sight appears humanitarian, is nothing more than an instrumentalisation of children:

"Bringing an arbitrarily determined number of underage migrants to Germany does not solve the actual problems on the ground. On the contrary: it sends exactly the wrong signal. It sets a further incentive for people willing to immigrate to send their children forward, just as it is already happening now. The next step is the reunion of families. The pull effect of the German welfare state is further strengthened.
Here, left-wing media and politicians in Germany are pulling in the same direction as Erdogan: Migrants who have been living in Turkey for years are deliberately mislabeled as refugees and staged images of crying children are produced and distributed as moral blackmail. Those who, like many German politicians of the old parties, demand the immediate admission of these people to the EU are playing Erdogan's game. Austria's Federal Chancellor Kurz has also put it clearly and correctly. A new 2015 is on the horizon here. We must not allow this to happen."

Weidel and Gauland speak out against mass reception of youth and child migrants

On March 9 in Berlin, Deputy Chairwoman Alice Weidel and Honorary Chair Alexander Gauland view the decision of the coalition committee to accept children and young people from refugee camps in Greece throughout Europe as a fatal signal that could trigger a new wave of migration in which whole families will enter the EU via the 'anchor children':

"There is no question that Germany should do its utmost to improve the situation of the people in the Greek refugee camps. But with the money that German taxpayers now have to pay for the care of unaccompanied children and youths in Germany many more people could be helped locally. The Grand Coalition's decision to accept children and young people from the refugee camps in Greece means that the dam has burst. We all know that the number of up to 1,500 people agreed between the CDU/CSU and the SPD will not remain at the level agreed upon. Soon there will be calls for family reunification so that the children and young people do not have to live permanently separated from their parents.
It now becomes clear: Those who want to come to Germany only have to send their children forward. Illegal migration is worthwhile, is the fatal message. With its decision, the grand coalition is also stabbing the steadfast Greek government in the back and sending a fatal signal to Turkish President Erdogan. His tactics of putting Europe under pressure with refugees are beginning to bear fruit.

*     *     *

EU Commission is putting the finishing touches to dictatorial climate legislation

On March 6, Dr. Sylvia Limmer, member of the Federal Executive Committee and EU Member of Parliament, commented on the climate law passed this week:

"The European Commission this week published the so-called climate bill. It states that climate neutrality within the European Union by 2050 is the ultimate goal. It is the first time that such targets have been enshrined in a law - and are therefore binding for all Member States.

As if that were not enough, all future laws and laws already passed in the past will be reviewed to see whether they are in line with the targets set out in the climate law. Future laws will be based on reports from UN conferences or the IPCC, the so-called Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The fact that focusing on the content of reports coming from political institutions is highly problematic does not really need to be emphasised separately. Apparently, however, the Greta disciples - Greta was present on the podium at the presentation of the law alongside [Ursula] von der Leyen - see things differently in the Commission.

Moreover, the EU Commission even wants to examine at regular intervals the compatibility of the national energy and climate plans and the two annual progress reports with the objectives of the climate law and the road map drawn up by the Commission, i.e. whether the envisaged steps will be achieved on time. If they do not meet these conditions, this may lead to 'recommendations' to adapt them accordingly.

This may well be seen as interference in the actions of national governments. Another attack on the sovereignty of nation states, another attack on the principle of subsidiarity. The latter is already being undermined by suggesting a need for action at the highest level, which the Commission, of course, understands itself to be. Official justification, which is also already implemented in the EU Treaties: since the climate does not end at the borders, an individual Member State cannot take adequate measures, which only the EU can do. The principle of subsidiarity is therefore de facto already excluded with regard to climate issues.

The fact that the transition to climate neutrality according to the draft law is supposed to be irreversible gives a deep insight. There is no reference whatsoever to non-European measures, which puts the finishing touches to the Commission's climate-dictating legislation. The Commission sees itself as the messiah and wants to save the world on its own. Instead, it will merely ruin the German economy permanently.''