Mark Weber

The Heretics' Hour: Why we need a consistent message for White people and where we go wrong

Published by carolyn on Mon, 2014-03-03 19:32
 
00:00

March 3, 2014

This program marks the fourth anniversary of The Heretics’ Hour, which began on March 1, 2010 on the Voice of Reason Network. Carolyn addresses the need for a consistent message from those who have a platform to speak to White people and points out where the message is most dangerously inconsistent. Major points made:

  • The behavior of people who cannot defend themselves from charges made against them vs behavior of those who can;
  • Paul Eisen and Gilad Atzmon as human rights advocates whose “liberal” Jewish views about Germans stop at the Adolf Hitler/”Nazi” line;
  • Revisionist Michael Hoffman, a Roman Catholic, also abhors Hitler and tells lies about him, thus keeping religion above race;
  • Rodney Martin’s page at Metapedia – how it came to be;
  • Martin’s brand of activism – speaking at an IHR meeting (see photo at right) and writing letters to U.S. senators on behalf of a U.S.-German peace treaty;
  • Martin’s exchange with a German who was trying to correct him about a German/U.S. peace treaty.

Image:  The Three Stooges? Rodney Martin, Mark Weber, David Cole -- three flawed messengers with three different flawed messages.

Everything Greg Johnson knows about Holocaust Revisionism he learned from Mark Weber

Published by carolyn on Sun, 2012-08-05 00:02

By Carolyn Yeager
copyright 2012 Carolyn Yeager

The latest White Nationalist figure to announce his flight from Holocaust Revisionism is the editor of Counter-Currents Publishing, Greg Johnson. In an article titled “Dealing with The Holocaust” published on June 20 at the Occidental Observer, Johnson gave a whole list of reasons why Holocaust Revisionism was not “necessary” to the prospering of what he has dubbed the North American New Right. Just three years ago, Mark Weber (pictured at right) used virtually identical reasons to explain why Holocaust Revisionism had become “irrelevant” to the work of the Institute for Historical Review (IHR).