Saturday Afternoon: Killing the Holocaust Myth, Part 2

Published by carolyn on Sat, 2013-10-12 12:01

Oct. 12, 2013

Carolyn continues examining the new revisionist book The “Extermination Camps” of “Aktion Reinhardt” by Carlo Mattogno, Jürgen Graf and Thomas Kues. Chapter 5, “The Führer Order and the Alleged NS Extermination Policy” exposes the lies, plagiarism and bad faith behind the “Five Bloggers” attack on our revisionists' previous work on "Aktion Reinhardt". They claim N-S intent to exterminate every Jew in Europe! A few highlights:

  • A salute to Capt. Erich Priebke who has died of natural causes at age 100;
  • The ever-elusive “Führer Order” had to come between summer 1941 and summer 1942 – since a  surge in “atrocity reports” began in August 1942;
  • Two pillars of the extermination camp myth are “eye-witness testimony” and “confessions of perpetrators” – without that the whole edifice falls;
  • The word Sonderbehandlung (Special Treatment) was not removed from the Korherr Report (as supposedly requested by Himmler);
  • Attempts to prove an N-S policy of extermination by Mass Starvation fall flat; likewise with turning a reprisal policy for partisan terrorism into Jewish Extermination;
  • The two Gas Vans were fueled with generator gas – not appropriate for homicidal purposes.

Image: Supposed to be a massacre in Poland, but it could be a composite. Why are the dead piled up like that? And why would a Pole be able to take this picture? In any case, reprisal for killing/mutilating German troops was legal and necessary, whether in Poland or Russia.


5 Responses

  1. Markus

    October 12, 2013 at 9:50 pm

    Sonderbehandlung usually refers to more food, more free time, free cigarettes once in a while and so forth.

    German is a very direct and descriptive language and cynical or funny conotations are not made, especially in politics, military or science. If Sonderbehanung had a different meaning, it would have been written or defined.

    This notion that Germans could themselves decide how to interpret Sonderbehandlung contradicts that Germans follow orders, which they do once they voluntarily commissioned a superior to give orders.

    I don’t believe it for one minute, unless Sonderbehandlung is somewhere thouroughly defined as to kill people and by what method.

  1. Markus

    October 14, 2013 at 2:12 pm

    A previously unknown diary by Harry Truman, discovered in 2003, revealed that he harbored harsh feelings about Jews. Incensed when former Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau, Jr. called him about the plight of the refugee ship Exodus in 1947, Truman wrote in his diary, “He [had] no business, whatever to call me. The Jews have no sense of proportion nor do they have any judgment on world affairs… The Jews, I find, are very, very selfish. They care not how many Estonians, Latvians, Finns, Poles, Yugoslavs or Greeks get murdered or mistreated as D[isplaced] P[erson]s as long as the Jews get special treatment. Yet when they have power, physical, financial or political neither Hitler nor Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment to the under dog.”’s-private-thoughts-about-jews/

    OMG, Truman said special treatment of the Jews. What a cynical Nazi!

  1. Carolyn

    October 14, 2013 at 2:33 pm

    Markus, I think Truman was more disappointed in modern-day Jews than antisemitic. He was all for the creation of Israel, based on his Christian-Zionist biblical beliefs. He went against the good advice of his advisors that an “Israel” was going to seriously and detrimentally upset the balance in the middle-east.

  1. Markus

    October 14, 2013 at 3:16 pm

    I believe a lot of people like Truman, Churchill etc knew about the Jewish Question very well, but were compromised by money and fear.

    I also believe many people today are rather voluntary dupes because of all the brainwashing, so they don’t even have these thoughts in private , Carolyn.

  1. Carolyn

    October 14, 2013 at 4:06 pm

    I believe a lot of people like Truman, Churchill etc knew about the Jewish Question very well, but were compromised by money and fear.

    What you believe is of no interest to others/has no value. What you can prove or at least demonstrate is all that counts. Money and fear, in this instance, is too broad to use against Truman. Did he really want money? He did want to get reelected but I don’t think he would have tarnished his own legacy about world order and peace if he couldn’t turn it into an Old Testament God thing in his mind. “God wanted it; it was Just.” He also had no remorse over using the A-bomb on Japan, when it wasn’t necessary for Japanese surrender. Very Jewish.

Add new comment